Infrastructure for Quality Certification and Traceability in the Floriculture Industry
David Tacuri
ID: 69fc12c1f9ebc26d057f51c8
Context The global floriculture market was valued at USD 77.31 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 127.98 billion by 2034, with a CAGR of 5.76%. ([**Source**](https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/floriculture-market-109122)) The Problem Despite its scale, the floriculture industry faces major challenges in traceability and protection of plant intellectual property. The ([Source](https://food.ec.europa.eu/plants/plant-variety-property-rights_en)), the largest import market, has strengthened regulations through the Community Plant Variety Rights (CPVR) and UPOV 1991 convention. Breeders lose significant revenue due to illegal multiplication and unpaid royalties, resulting in costly audits, legal disputes, and reduced innovation. Buyers and regulators increasingly demand origin certification, compliance, and transparent traceability. Proposed Solution We will develop a lightweight, secure, and scalable infrastructure on Cardano that enables the automatic generation of digital quality certificates and authorizations after contracts are signed between propagators (such as Plantec), growers, and breeders. The solution includes: - Immutable registration of certificates and licenses without exposing sensitive data. - QR code and web-based verification. - Integration with existing contract workflows. - Optional batch and export traceability. The initial pilot will be implemented with Plantec in Latin America, with architecture designed for global scalability. Value to Cardano and Vision 2030 Alignment This project drives real-world adoption and enterprise utility in a high-value traditional industry. It is expected to generate approximately 450,000 on-chain transactions in Year 1, 1 million in Year 2, and 3–5 million annually by Year 3, contributing sustainable fees to the Cardano Treasury.
Scorecard
How this score works
Each criterion is worth between 1 and 4 points. The score is the points earned out of the points on criteria that have been answered — shown as a percentage. Green is 75% or higher, Amber is 50–74%, and Red is below 50%.
Some criteria are checked automatically against the proposal data (open source, doxxed team, treasury return clauses, etc.). Others are human-judgment calls — value for money, public good, whether the deliverables are realistic. Those stay blank until a DRep ticks them.
Criteria can also be marked Not applicablewhen they don't fit the proposal — for example, "open source" doesn't apply to a DAO governance proposal with no software output. Those are excluded from the score entirely, neither helping nor hurting.
Green requires 80% coverage. If less than 80% of the applicable criteria (by points) have been answered, the verdict stays at Amber — "pending review" — even when every answered criterion passes. This proposal's coverage is currently 68% (13 of 19 applicable criteria answered).
Vote intent
Export & audit
↓ Download scorecard.mdRaw payload · Treasury (false) / Admin (intersect)
{
"_meta": {
"schema_version": "1.2.0",
"filename": "hydra-plantec-floriculture-traceability.json",
"ingested_at": "2026-05-11",
"source": "Cardano Budget Process 2026 - Hydra/Ekklesia",
"proposal_id": "69fc12c1f9ebc26d057f51c8",
"title": "Infrastructure for Quality Certification and Traceability in the Floriculture Industry",
"proposer": "David Tacuri"
},
"proposal": {
"id": "69fc12c1f9ebc26d057f51c8",
"title": "Infrastructure for Quality Certification and Traceability in the Floriculture Industry",
"proposer": "David Tacuri",
"submitted_at": "2026-05-08T03:52:00Z"
},
"ask": {
"total_ada": 653947,
"total_usd": 163487,
"proposer_ada_rate_usd": 0.25,
"duration_months": 12,
"usd_peg_vs_market": "neutral",
"usd_peg_vs_market_set_by": "ai",
"milestone_payments_disclosed": true,
"milestone_schedule_disclosed": "amounts_only",
"milestone_schedule_disclosed_set_by": "ai",
"admin_fee_ada": 19047,
"contingency_reserve_ada": 0
},
"identity": {
"doxxed": true,
"doxxed_set_by": "ai",
"applicant_type": "individual",
"named_leads": [
"David Tacuri (Lead Full Stack / Blockchain Developer)",
"Juan Guanolema (Blockchain Developer)",
"Fernando Yánez (Electoral Software Engineer / Lead Full Stack)",
"Andrés Flores (Software Engineer / Full Stack)"
]
},
"metadata": {
"open_source": "yes",
"open_source_set_by": "ai",
"open_source_notes": "Proposer commits to MIT/Apache 2.0 licensing on GitHub for all technical development.",
"has_prior_delivery": true,
"has_prior_delivery_set_by": "ai",
"prior_delivery_notes": "Team has delivered 2 prior Catalyst projects (blockchain voting system, digital voter ID with Atala PRISM migrating to Hyperledger Identus). Team has 30+ national electoral processes experience in Ecuador. No prior Intersect-administered Cardano Treasury delivery.",
"admin_model": "intersect",
"admin_model_set_by": "ai",
"duplicate_of_existing_solution": {
"value": "no",
"confidence": "medium",
"set_by": "ai"
}
},
"treasury_return": {
"has_return_clause": false,
"return_clause_set_by": "ai",
"treasury_favourability": "weak",
"treasury_favourability_set_by": "ai",
"return_mechanism_notes": "Proposer answered 'No' to treasury return question. No contingency reserve, no peg-cap return mechanism. Note: third-party assurance described as funded from the 90,000 ADA External Security Audit line in WP2 (auditing smart contracts before Mainnet); this is product audit, not financial assurance / treasury return."
},
"relationships": {
"competes_with": [],
"related_proposals": [],
"notes": "Single named pilot partner (Plantec) in Latin American floriculture. No competing or related proposals identified in this batch."
},
"ecosystem_demand": {
"evidence_level": "weak",
"evidence_level_confidence": "medium",
"evidence_level_set_by": "ai",
"active_users_known": true,
"active_users_examples": [
{
"name": "Plantec",
"kind": "user",
"url": null
}
],
"developer_demand_signals": [],
"adoption_risk_notes": "One named industry partner (Plantec) provides some evidence — but no letter of intent is referenced, only a stated 'direct partnership'. The on-chain transaction projections (450k Year 1, 1M Year 2, 3-5M Year 3) are extrapolations from a single pilot with no committed second customer. WP4 sets a target of '2+ additional breeders' adopting the standard, but these are not pre-committed. The broader floriculture-industry demand for blockchain-based UPOV 1991 compliance traceability is asserted but not evidenced with industry surveys, regulator statements, or breeder commitments. The case for institutional demand from European CPVR regulators is hand-waved."
},
"incumbents": {
"has_existing_solution": "unknown",
"has_existing_solution_confidence": "low",
"has_existing_solution_set_by": "ai",
"existing_solutions": [],
"differentiation_claim": "Proposal claims novelty in being the first Cardano-based floriculture IP traceability infrastructure. CIP-68 dynamic metadata + IPFS + Aiken contract architecture is described as differentiated from existing supply-chain provenance solutions. No competing Cardano-side floriculture solutions are named; competitive landscape outside Cardano (existing UPOV-compliance software vendors in floriculture) not addressed.",
"differentiation_credibility": "medium"
},
"risk_flags": {
"aggressive_peg": false,
"self_administered_no_oversight": false,
"incumbent_already_delivering": false,
"no_evidence_of_demand": false,
"competes_with_in_batch": false,
"concentration_risk": false
},
"notes": {
"ai_review_notes": "Modest, well-scoped ask (~654k ADA over 12 months). Team has credible electoral software / institutional systems track record though prior Cardano delivery is limited to 2 Catalyst projects. Concerns: (1) no treasury return clause, no contingency reserve; (2) demand evidence rests on a single pilot partner without an LOI being mentioned; (3) on-chain transaction projections (3-5M/year by Year 3) are aspirational and depend on cross-industry adoption that the proposal does not evidence; (4) the assurance setup mixes the external smart-contract audit with general delivery oversight — the 90k ADA audit line is fit for technical audit but the proposal does not name a separate financial / milestone assurer. Strengths: open-source commitment is clear, scope is realistic relative to budget, the WP2 dedicated security audit is a positive signal."
},
"id": "hydra-plantec-floriculture-traceability",
"source": {
"hydra_id": "69fc12c1f9ebc26d057f51c8",
"channels": [
"hydra"
]
}
}