Skip to main content
IntersectGovernancehydra

Cardano Budget Committee: Budget Process Improvement and Treasury Transparency (2026–2027)

IntersectCBC (Cardano Budget Committee)

ID: 69f22067d699758cde5d4a70

This proposal supports Intersect’s Cardano Budget Committee’s continued evolution of Cardano’s treasury governance through two core work packages: (1) budget process and tooling improvement, and (2) treasury transparency and analytics. Following the 2026 budget cycle — the first to run on a unified, end-to-end platform — this proposal focuses on refining both the operational framework and the supporting infrastructure to improve how treasury decisions are made. The work is designed to make the budgeting process more repeatable, accessible, and scalable, while strengthening transparency and enabling data-informed decision-making. By improving both process and tooling, and enhancing visibility into treasury activity, this initiative supports more effective capital allocation and increased confidence in governance outcomes. The execution of the work packages outlined in the proposal is contingent on the IntersectMBO budget proposal's approval. We would have to withdraw our proposal should the IntersectMBO proposal fail the hydra vote.

View full proposal on Intersect Hydra Voting

Ask (ADA)
600,000
Ask (USD)
Peg
Eff. ADA @ spot
Peg vs market
neutral

Scorecard

13 of 19 criteria answered
Amber · 100%· pending review

How this score works

Each criterion is worth between 1 and 4 points. The score is the points earned out of the points on criteria that have been answered — shown as a percentage. Green is 75% or higher, Amber is 50–74%, and Red is below 50%.

Some criteria are checked automatically against the proposal data (open source, doxxed team, treasury return clauses, etc.). Others are human-judgment calls — value for money, public good, whether the deliverables are realistic. Those stay blank until a DRep ticks them.

Criteria can also be marked Not applicablewhen they don't fit the proposal — for example, "open source" doesn't apply to a DAO governance proposal with no software output. Those are excluded from the score entirely, neither helping nor hurting.

Green requires 80% coverage. If less than 80% of the applicable criteria (by points) have been answered, the verdict stays at Amber — "pending review" — even when every answered criterion passes. This proposal's coverage is currently 68% (13 of 19 applicable criteria answered). The auto-calculated band would have been Green, but coverage is below the threshold so the verdict is shown as Amber to flag that judgment criteria are still pending.

Vote intent

Raw payload · Treasury (true) / Admin (self_with_oversight)
{
  "_meta": {
    "schema_version": "1.2.0",
    "ingested_at": "2026-05-11",
    "ingested_by": "ai",
    "proposal_id": "69f22067d699758cde5d4a70",
    "title": "Cardano Budget Committee: Budget Process Improvement and Treasury Transparency (2026–2027)",
    "proposer": "IntersectCBC (Cardano Budget Committee)"
  },
  "id": "hydra-budget-committee-process-treasury-transparency",
  "title": "Cardano Budget Committee: Budget Process Improvement and Treasury Transparency (2026–2027)",
  "proposer": "IntersectCBC (Cardano Budget Committee)",
  "administrator": "Self (Intersect administers own committee proposal)",
  "identity": {
    "doxxed": true,
    "doxxed_notes": "Intersect elected committee operating publicly with weekly published meeting minutes and community consultation record."
  },
  "ask": {
    "total_ada": 600000,
    "usd_equivalent": 150000,
    "usd_peg": 0.25,
    "usd_peg_vs_market": "neutral",
    "duration_months": 12,
    "milestone_payments_disclosed": true,
    "milestone_schedule_disclosed": "amounts_and_dates",
    "work_packages": [
      {
        "id": "WP1",
        "title": "Treasury Transparency & Analytics",
        "ada": 120000
      },
      {
        "id": "WP2",
        "title": "Intersect Budget Process & Tooling Improvement",
        "ada": 480000
      }
    ]
  },
  "metadata": {
    "open_source": "yes",
    "has_prior_delivery": true,
    "prior_delivery_notes": "Designed and delivered 2025 and 2026 Cardano budget processes. 194 proposals reviewed, 39 on-chain treasury withdrawal actions, 270M ADA approved, 40 vendors contracted. 2026 cycle improvements directly traceable to 2025 retrospective findings.",
    "admin_model": "self_with_oversight",
    "duplicate_of_existing_solution": {
      "value": "no",
      "confidence": "high",
      "set_by": "ai"
    }
  },
  "treasury_return": {
    "has_return_clause": true,
    "return_description": "Event funds returned if events not held. ADA returned if committee members replaced and new members don't proceed. Unused ADA returned after full execution.",
    "treasury_favourability": "moderate"
  },
  "ecosystem_demand": {
    "evidence_level": "strong",
    "evidence_level_confidence": "high",
    "evidence_level_set_by": "ai",
    "active_users_known": true,
    "active_users_examples": [
      {
        "name": "DReps (approx. 700+ engaged in 2025-2026 budget process)",
        "kind": "user"
      },
      {
        "name": "194+ proposal teams from 2026 cycle",
        "kind": "user"
      },
      {
        "name": "Intersect committees and working groups",
        "kind": "user"
      }
    ],
    "developer_demand_signals": [
      "2026 budget cycle identified specific process pain points (inconsistent formats, misaligned off-chain/on-chain thresholds, heavy DRep workload) that this proposal addresses",
      "Ekklesia platform improvements are a direct request from the budget process user community",
      "Treasury transparency tooling and NCL scenario modelling are identified gaps with direct DRep governance utility",
      "Proposal is contingent on IntersectMBO approval — governance dependency is acknowledged"
    ],
    "adoption_risk_notes": "Demand is well-evidenced from the budget committee's own retrospective. Primary risk is that WP2 tooling improvements (200k ADA) require Ekklesia/engineering team availability which is not entirely within the CBC's control. Workshop logistics (Rare Evo, Summit, Latam) are highest-cost items and benefit is less directly measurable."
  },
  "incumbents": {
    "has_existing_solution": "no",
    "has_existing_solution_confidence": "high",
    "has_existing_solution_set_by": "ai",
    "existing_solutions": [],
    "differentiation_claim": "Intersect's elected Budget Committee is the designated body for Cardano budget process governance. No alternative entity performs this function.",
    "differentiation_credibility": "high"
  },
  "risk_flags": {
    "aggressive_peg": false,
    "self_administered_no_oversight": false,
    "incumbent_already_delivering": false,
    "no_evidence_of_demand": false,
    "competes_with_in_batch": false,
    "concentration_risk": false
  },
  "source": {
    "hydra_id": "69f22067d699758cde5d4a70",
    "channels": [
      "hydra"
    ]
  }
}